Supreme_Court

The Supreme Court has insulted you over and over again, Lord. They've taken your Bible away from the schools. They've forbidden little children to pray. They've taken the knowledge of God as best they can, and organizations have come into court to take the knowledge of God out of the public square of America.

The Supreme Court of the United States... has validated the Nazi method of execution in... concentration camps, starving them to death.

The Oval Office symbolizes... the Constitution, the hopes and dreams, and I'm going to say democracy. And when you have a dress code in the Supreme Court and a dress code on the floor of the Senate, floor of the House, I think it's appropriate to have an expectation that there will be a dress code that respects the office of the President.

In the Brown decision, the United States Supreme Court unanimously struck down the legal and moral footing of racially segregated public education in this country.

In the Pentagon Papers case, the government asserted in the Supreme Court that the publication of the material was a threat to national security. It turned out it was not a threat to U.S. security. But even if it had been, that doesn't mean that it couldn't be published.

Got good news and bad news for you, Mr. President. The good news is that Chief Justice John Roberts just saved your legacy and, perhaps, your presidency by writing for the Supreme Court majority to rule health care reform constitutional.

The Supreme Court has never ruled that Congress can use the Commerce Clause to require individuals to engage in an activity they have chosen to avoid. Yet that is precisely what Obamacare does: It forces Americans without health insurance to purchase coverage. Such a requirement is unprecedented and unconstitutional.

Conservatives shouldn't count on the Supreme Court to do our work for us on Obamacare. The Court may rule as it should, and strike down the mandate. But it may not. And even if it does, the future of health care in America - and for that matter, the future of limited government - depends ultimately on the verdict of the American people.

Supreme_Court, Supreme_Court, upreme_Court, Supreme_Court, Syupreme_Court, S7upreme_Court, S8upreme_Court, Siupreme_Court, Sjupreme_Court, Sypreme_Court, S7preme_Court, S8preme_Court, Sipreme_Court, Sjpreme_Court, Suypreme_Court, Su7preme_Court, Su8preme_Court, Suipreme_Court, Sujpreme_Court, Suopreme_Court, Su0preme_Court, Sulpreme_Court, Suoreme_Court, Su0reme_Court, Sulreme_Court, Suporeme_Court, Sup0reme_Court, Suplreme_Court, Supereme_Court, Sup4reme_Court, Sup5reme_Court, Suptreme_Court, Supfreme_Court, Supeeme_Court, Sup4eme_Court, Sup5eme_Court, Supteme_Court, Supfeme_Court, Supreeme_Court, Supr4eme_Court, Supr5eme_Court, Suprteme_Court, Suprfeme_Court, Suprweme_Court, Supr3eme_Court, Supr4eme_Court, Suprreme_Court, Suprseme_Court, Suprdeme_Court, Suprwme_Court, Supr3me_Court, Supr4me_Court, Suprrme_Court, Suprsme_Court, Suprdme_Court, Suprewme_Court, Supre3me_Court, Supre4me_Court, Suprerme_Court, Supresme_Court, Supredme_Court, Suprenme_Court, Suprejme_Court, Suprekme_Court, Supre,me_Court, Supre me_Court, Suprene_Court, Supreje_Court, Supreke_Court, Supre,e_Court, Supre e_Court, Supremne_Court, Supremje_Court, Supremke_Court, Suprem,e_Court, Suprem e_Court, Supremwe_Court, Suprem3e_Court, Suprem4e_Court, Supremre_Court, Supremse_Court, Supremde_Court, Supremw_Court, Suprem3_Court, Suprem4_Court, Supremr_Court, Suprems_Court, Supremd_Court, Supremew_Court, Supreme3_Court, Supreme4_Court, Supremer_Court, Supremes_Court, Supremed_Court, Supreme_Court, SupremeCourt, Supreme_Court, Supreme_Court, Supreme_ourt, Supreme_Court, Supreme_Ciourt, Supreme_C9ourt, Supreme_C0ourt, Supreme_Cpourt, Supreme_Clourt, Supreme_Ciurt, Supreme_C9urt, Supreme_C0urt, Supreme_Cpurt, Supreme_Clurt, Supreme_Coiurt, Supreme_Co9urt, Supreme_Co0urt, Supreme_Copurt, Supreme_Colurt, Supreme_Coyurt, Supreme_Co7urt, Supreme_Co8urt, Supreme_Coiurt, Supreme_Cojurt, Supreme_Coyrt, Supreme_Co7rt, Supreme_Co8rt, Supreme_Coirt, Supreme_Cojrt, Supreme_Couyrt, Supreme_Cou7rt, Supreme_Cou8rt, Supreme_Couirt, Supreme_Coujrt, Supreme_Couert, Supreme_Cou4rt, Supreme_Cou5rt, Supreme_Coutrt, Supreme_Coufrt, Supreme_Couet, Supreme_Cou4t, Supreme_Cou5t, Supreme_Coutt, Supreme_Couft, Supreme_Couret, Supreme_Cour4t, Supreme_Cour5t, Supreme_Courtt, Supreme_Courft, Supreme_Courrt, Supreme_Cour5t, Supreme_Cour6t, Supreme_Couryt, Supreme_Courgt, Supreme_Courr, Supreme_Cour5, Supreme_Cour6, Supreme_Coury, Supreme_Courg, Supreme_Courtr, Supreme_Court5, Supreme_Court6, Supreme_Courty, Supreme_Courtg.

The Florida Supreme Court wanted all the legal votes to be counted. The United States Supreme Court, on the other hand, did not want all the votes to be counted.

Catholicism is a wide tent in terms of political and legal positions. We could have nine Catholics on the Supreme Court and a great deal of diversity toward the law.

The facts are plain: Religious leaders who preside over marriage ceremonies must and will be guided by what they believe. If they do not wish to celebrate marriages for same-sex couples, that is their right. The Supreme Court says so. And the Charter says so.

Our national media refuses to report that even the Supreme Court did not say marriage was a human right in all cases nor did it say that the heterosexual definition violated anyone's right or that the heterosexual definition of marriage was unconstitutional.

It was the courts, of course, that took away prayer from our schools, that took away Bible reading from our schools. It's the courts that gave us same-sex marriage. So it is quite a battlefield, and the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land.

The Supreme Court has ruled that they cannot have a nativity scene in Washington, D.C. This wasn't for any religious reasons. They couldn't find three wise men and a virgin.

I can tell you that too much money is corrupting American politics. Don't blame the American public. The U.S. Supreme Court has a lot to answer for, because it has made it impossible for Congress to reduce the corrupting influence of money on American political life.

The irony of the Supreme Court hearing on these cases last week and of the outright hostility that the Court has displayed against religion in recent years is that above the head of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is a concrete display of the Ten Commandments.

Any successful nominee should possess both the temperament to interpret the law and the wisdom to do so fairly. The next Supreme Court Justice should have a record of protecting individual rights and a strong willingness to put aside any political agenda.